To share this content with an AI assistant
Nuclear energyHigh pressureHigh temperatureIndustrial scale

Boiling Water Reactor (BWR)

Direct-cycle nuclear reactor: core water boils at 285 °C / 70 bar to produce the steam that drives the turbine directly, without a secondary loop. ~70 reactors in service (~25 % of the world fleet), mainly in the United States, Japan and Sweden.

Electricity from fission or fusion

Key reaction

²³⁵U + n → fragments + 2-3 n + ~200 MeV ; eau saturée à 285 °C / 70 bar entraîne directement la turbine

Operating conditions

Temperature
285°C
Pressure
70bar
Catalyst
Aucun (réaction nucléaire)
Phase
two-phase (water + steam)

How it works

Schema coming soon

How it works

The boiling water reactor is the main architectural alternative to the PWR. Designed by General Electric from 1955, it was promoted as a simplification: by directly boiling water in the core rather than keeping it pressurized and transferring heat to a secondary loop, the steam generators, pressurizer and entire secondary circuit are eliminated. The result is a more compact system, in principle cheaper to build. The trade-off is heavy: the steam that drives the turbine is mildly radioactive (¹⁶N activation into short-lived ¹⁶O, traces of tritium and corrosion products). The turbine hall must therefore lie in a controlled radiation zone — which is not the case for a PWR. Operating pressure is also lower (70 bar vs 155 bar for PWR), capping thermodynamic efficiency at ~33 % vs ~36 % for PWR. Passive safety is another challenge: steam separation and drying happen directly above the core, inside the vessel, which complicates the design. The Fukushima Daiichi disaster of March 2011 marked the history of the technology. The six reactors were BWR Mark I units designed in the 1960s, with the fuel pool sited above the core inside the reactor building. The simultaneous loss of grid power and emergency diesels after the tsunami led to partial meltdown of three cores and hydrogen explosions (water radiolysis and zirconium cladding oxidation above 1200 °C). Modern designs (ESBWR, ABWR Gen III+) now incorporate passive cooling systems (natural convection, gravity-fed tanks providing several days of autonomy) that aim to eliminate this failure mode. Boiling-water SMRs (GE Hitachi's BWRX-300, NuScale Power) extend the same logic in miniaturized form.

Key components

The role of each main part, and the elements / compounds it involves.

  • BWR pressure vessel

    Contains the core, steam separator and dryer — the entire thermohydraulic chain fits in a single envelope.

    Cylindrical ferritic-steel vessel about 21 m tall and 6 m in diameter, taller than a PWR vessel (15 m) because it houses internal steam separation and drying. Operating pressure 70 bar, temperature 285 °C. Wall thickness (~150 mm) is lower than in a PWR thanks to the lower pressure — an economic advantage of the design.

    21 m × 6 m · 70 bar · 285 °C · acier ferritique

  • UO₂ fuel core

    Sustains controlled fission of ²³⁵U and boils the cooling water.

    ~600 to 800 fuel assemblies (depending on reactor size), each made of 92 UO₂ rods enriched 3-5 % in ²³⁵U inside zircaloy cladding. Control rods (B₄C or Ag-In-Cd) are inserted from the bottom — a BWR specificity — because the top is taken up by the steam separators. Fuel cycle typically lasts 18 to 24 months before refuelling.

    600-800 assemblages · UO₂ enrichi 3-5 % · gaine zircaloy

    See also :uo2
  • Steam separator and dryer

    Separates steam from water droplets to deliver dry steam to the turbine.

    Above the core, the water/steam mixture first crosses ~250 cyclones (centrifugation), then a chevron-plate dryer. Outlet steam contains less than 0.1 % moisture, a necessary condition to avoid eroding turbine blades. Separated water falls back to the core via a downcomer — providing the primary loop's natural convection.

    ~250 cyclones · sécheur chevronnes · humidité < 0,1 %

  • Jet recirculation pumps

    Modulate core flow without moving parts inside the vessel.

    An elegant BWR specificity: 16 to 24 jet pumps (no rotor) inside the vessel, fed by 2 external recirculation loops. Varying their flow shifts core-outlet void fraction, which is a fast power-modulation lever (without moving control rods). BWR/4 and /6 use this principle; ABWR replaces them with sealed internal pumps (RIP).

    16-24 pompes à jet · 2 boucles externes · régulation par débit

  • Mark I/II/III containment

    Contains radioactivity in case of accident, using a pressure suppression pool.

    Iconic design: a pear-shaped drywell hosting the vessel, connected via downcomers to a torus partially filled with water (wetwell). In case of steam leak, steam crosses the wetwell which condenses it — internal pressure is limited. Mark I (Fukushima) is compact but has little free volume; Mark II and III enlarge the containment. Recent BWRs (ABWR, ESBWR) use a simpler cylindrical containment.

    Drywell + wetwell · suppression pression vapeur · Mark I/II/III · cylindrique sur Gen III+

Physical and chemical principles

The fundamental laws that make this process possible — and the constraints they impose.

  • Direct steam cycle — simplicity vs radioprotection

    Where the PWR separates the primary loop (radioactive, pressurized) from the secondary loop (clean) via a steam generator, the BWR uses a single water flow through core, turbine and condenser. This is thermohydraulically simpler and cheaper in capex, but requires the entire turbine hall to be classified as a controlled radiation zone because of residual steam radioactivity (mainly ¹⁶N, half-life 7.1 s — radioactivity vanishes quickly at shutdown).

    Une seule boucle eau-vapeur · ¹⁶O(n,p)¹⁶N en cœur
    Applies to components :cuve-bwrseparateur-vapeur
  • Negative void coefficient (passive safety)

    The more water boils in the core, the larger the steam (void) fraction, the lower the neutron moderation (steam is ~1000× less dense than liquid water). Less moderation = fewer thermal fissions = less power. This feedback loop is inherently stabilising: a local runaway self-extinguishes. It is one of the key advantages of BWRs over Soviet RBMKs (which had a positive coefficient, the root cause of Chernobyl).

    α_void < 0 → P diminue quand fraction vapeur augmente

Compounds involved

Main applications

  • Base-load electricity generation95 %
  • Industrial heat production (rare)5 %

Fukushima legacy and shift to passive safety

The BWR fleet paid the heaviest civilian nuclear toll in history at Fukushima Daiichi (2011): three partial meltdowns, ~470,000 people evacuated, costs above USD 200 billion. The main lesson concerns autonomy during total loss of external power ("station blackout"): new ESBWR and ABWR Gen III+ designs integrate passive cooling systems with ~72 h autonomy without human intervention, catalytic hydrogen recombiners to prevent zirconium-water explosions, and corium catchers in case of meltdown. The BWRX-300 SMR (300 MWe), targeted for 2028, aims to cut capex 40 % vs ABWR.
  • Refroidissement passif gravitaire (~72 h sans alimentation)
  • Recombineurs catalytiques d'hydrogène (passive autocatalytic)
  • Récupérateurs de corium (core catcher)
  • Pompes internes étanches (RIP) à la place des pompes à jet (ABWR)
  • BWRX-300 — SMR de 300 MWe en cycle direct simplifié

Similar or competing processes

Related industrial processes — alternative chemistry, alternative technology.

  • centrale-pwr

    Dominant competing technology (~70 % of the world fleet); indirect cycle with secondary loop separated from the core — non-radioactive turbine.

  • candu

    Canadian heavy-water natural-uranium reactor — no enrichment needed, but more complex infrastructure.

  • molten-salt-reactor

    Molten salt reactor (Gen IV): fuel dissolved in liquid salt at atmospheric pressure, intrinsic passive safety. Still at demonstrator stage.

History and discovery

Discovery year1955
First industrial deployment1960
General Electric (Samuel Untermyer II et al.)· États-Unis
Sources
  • AIEA — Boiling Water Reactor Simulator (training material)
  • Lamarsh, J. — Introduction to Nuclear Engineering
  • GE Hitachi — ABWR / ESBWR Design Control Documents
  • TEPCO — Fukushima Daiichi Investigation Final Report (2012)
  • OECD/NEA — Nuclear Energy Data 2024
Processes